2 illustrates a distracting effect of the mullions between the viewable areas when the three monitors 100, 102 and 104 are used to display a single composite image. A relatively wide gap or mullion, e.g., gap 112 between the viewable areas 108 and 110 of the adjacent monitors 102 and 104, exists between adjacent viewable areas.įIG. The viewable areas are smaller than the front surface of the monitors because of the respective housings. The monitors 100, 102 and 104 have viewable areas 106, 108 and 110, respectively. 1B is a top view of the three arrayed monitors 100, 102 and 104 of FIG. 1A illustrates three conventional monitors 100, 102 and 104 placed side-by-side in an array. This prevents the displays from having an integrated look as illustrated in FIGS.
However, due to the packaging of most standard CRTs and other monitors, such a configuration typically results in wider than acceptable gap, also referred to as a mullion, between the displays. Multiple conventional computer monitors may be placed adjacently side by side to provide a type of arrayed display system. In addition, the current system is typically bulky and thus occupies a large space. However, a projector-based display system is typically not suited for widespread use by individuals since it is costly and generally requires a great deal of technical support and regular maintenance. The use of projector-based display systems may provide a larger viewable area and higher resolution than a single monitor or a display device. 5,136,390 entitled “Adjustable Multiple Image Display Smoothing Method and Apparatus” to create a single seamless image. The projector-based display systems may use, for example, the processed described in U.S. The result generally includes a composite image that combines the additive size, the additive brightness and the additive resolution of the multiple channel source and the multiple projectors. These systems typically include three or more video projectors that are arrayed in an overlapping adjacent format with each projector being fed by one channel of a visual computer or other video source. The arrayed display systems typically include projector-based display systems. A typical arrayed display system includes three or more video display devices that are adjacent to one another. Arrayed display systems have been used to create a viewable area that is taller or wider than what is normally available on a single monitor. Therefore, it is often desirable to display video or graphic images on a viewable area that is bigger than what is typically available on a single monitor.
MULTIPANEL GRAPHIC ILLUSTRATOR PROFESSIONAL
A professional computer user, e.g., a graphic artist or a CAD designer, in addition, may suffer from inefficiency or low productivity associated with being able to view only a portion of a large image or having to stack and re-stack multiple computer windows.Ī larger viewable area, i.e., larger screen real estate, and higher resolution, i.e., more pixels, is typically very useful for laying out and viewing a larger portion of video or graphic images at the same time.
MULTIPANEL GRAPHIC ILLUSTRATOR WINDOWS
The multiple windows typically overlay and block one another since the viewable area of a monitor is generally not large enough to accommodate more than a few computer windows at the same time.Ī typical home computer user may become frustrated by the crowding of the desktop screen by multiple computer windows.
In addition, users often display multiple computer windows simultaneously.
Many times, these designs are too detailed or too large to fully display on a single monitor with the desired high enough resolution. For example, designers of large systems often use computer aided design (CAD) tools to generate designs. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTIONĬomputer users often desire to view video or graphic images that exceed the viewable area of a single monitor. 9, 1999, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference. 60/138,245 entitled “Multi-Panel Video Display,” filed Jun. The present application claims the benefit of U.S.
0 kommentar(er)
